What happened here?
Bring planning records, environmental data and your own documents into one source-linked chronology—so you can see what changed, what is disputed and what still needs review.
Try the public place search
A quick example of the public record. The full case tools open once you sign in.
Try River Blackwater, Lough Neagh or Port of Cork
Environmental decisions rarely arrive in one tidy file.
A planning condition may sit in one system, a species record in another, flood information somewhere else, and the reason for a later decision inside a report or email. By the time someone needs the complete account, the original team may have moved on and the evidence may have changed.
BioVeracity preserves the sources, dates and changes so the next person does not have to reconstruct the case from the beginning.
How it works
Open a case
Choose the decision or place you need to understand. BioVeracity can retrieve relevant public records and keep them separate from your private case evidence.
Add and review the evidence
Upload authorised documents and review the extracted dates, claims and source passages. Nothing becomes an accepted finding until a user reviews it.
Build the record
See the chronology, compare conflicting statements, identify missing evidence and create a reviewed report with links back to the supporting sources.
- Open a case
- Gather records
- Review source passages
- Build chronology
- Export report
From a question to a defensible evidence record
An ecology or planning officer needs to understand whether development records, protected-species observations and flood or water evidence overlap around a site.
BioVeracity retrieves the available public records, preserves their dates and location precision, and shows what is near the site. The officer can then add assessments, correspondence and planning documents, review the relevant passages and build a traceable chronology.
Proximity is treated as something to investigate—not proof of ecological conflict.
Who it helps
Planning and enforcement
Reconstruct conditions, representations, decisions and subsequent evidence.
Ecology and environment
Connect species, habitat, water and development records while preserving location precision.
Infrastructure and water
Follow permits, monitoring, interventions, complaints and changing operational evidence.
Legal and expert review
Find the source passage behind a claim and distinguish accepted, disputed and missing evidence.
Evidence first. Conclusions remain reviewable.
- Every displayed claim links back to a source.
- Event dates remain separate from publication and retrieval dates.
- Unknown or conflicting information stays visible.
- Public context remains separate from private case evidence.
Pricing built around the work you need to complete
BioVeracity can support one difficult case, a team managing ongoing casework, or an institution following evidence across multiple places.
Pricing depends on the number of cases, named users, locations, evidence volume, reporting requirements and level of support required.
Guided case pilot
Use BioVeracity on one defined case or decision, with agreed evidence sources, a source-linked chronology and a reviewed report.
Professional workspace
For individual professionals or small teams managing multiple investigations and evidence records.
Institutional access
For councils, regulators, infrastructure operators and expert teams managing portfolios of places or cases.
We will confirm the scope, deliverables and price before any commitment. BioVeracity does not charge for an initial scoping conversation.
Trust and boundaries
BioVeracity organises evidence; it does not replace the judgement of planners, ecologists, regulators, engineers or legal professionals.
Community observations are retained as observations, not treated as verified pollution or causation. Users must only upload records they are authorised to hold. Identifiable children’s material must not be uploaded.
Stop rebuilding the same evidence trail.
Bring one difficult case to BioVeracity and establish what the available evidence can—and cannot—support.